| Author |
Message |
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: New Dell 21:9 monitor at higher resolution 3440x1400 |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 06 Dec 2013, 21:43
|
|
Replies: 2
Views: 3820
|
Big push for higher resolutions at the moment! Although I still like my 2560 27"  |
|
 |
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: Good upgrade from GTX570HD 2.5gb SLI |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 06 Dec 2013, 21:43
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 4332
|
If you already have NV Surround, and like how it works, no point switching camps.
Get the card with the most vRAM you can, preferably a 770, or 780, or Ti. The Titan isn't that great anymore compared to the 780Ti. |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: USB powered devices |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 30 Nov 2013, 09:58
|
|
Replies: 2
Views: 2997
|
| Yeah, the "charging ports" are something you need to turn on in the BIOS. Not all boards have it. |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: AMD Catalyst 13.5 Beta Released |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 08 May 2013, 11:13
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 5264
|
| and whats so important about 13.5 ? Performance gains seen on the entire AMD Radeon™ HD 7000 Series for the following: Far Cry 3: Improves performance up to 4% with Anti-Aliasing enabled Shogun II: Improves performance up to 20% with 8x Anti-Aliasing enabled Tomb Raider: Improves performance up to ... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: new card / monitor setup |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 09 Mar 2013, 10:48
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 4179
|
| Being a long term AMD fanboy in terms of graphics hardware, I personally think that nV really hit the nail on the head with the 600 series. My money would be on a 4GB 670 any day of the week, although the 7950 does offer fairly reasonable value too IMO. |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: 32" 1080p monitors and dot pitch questions |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 03 Jan 2013, 18:02
|
|
Replies: 2
Views: 3529
|
| If you want something wider, in 1 screen then I guess the 29" Dell would be a good choice. It is still 1080 lines, but is 2560 pixels across. Another alternative is to go for a "squarer" build with 3 screens in portrait. I can say I have just gone from 1680x1050 at 20" (16:10) to... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: Acer T232HL 3x Wide? |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 30 Dec 2012, 12:59
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 4434
|
| You would probably want to read: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/graphics/display/geforce-gtx-660-ti-sli.html BEFORE you jump in. Remember the: 1) Heat output from 3 cards 2) Power consumption (read as you NEED a monster PSU) 3) 2 way SLI (normal) is dependant on the nV driver team. 3 way is even m... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: Need Advice on AMD 5x1 Build |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 24 Dec 2012, 21:35
|
|
Replies: 11
Views: 6603
|
| I use the 2600K rig at 4.2Ghz, in Vegas 11 for my videos. I run HT on, and I can encode stuff pretty fast. I don't have any figures, or way to compare it, but safe to say I can play back 1080p50 footage in real time without any stuttering at full resolution (from AVCHD, so the CPU needs to "unc... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: Need Advice on AMD 5x1 Build |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 23 Dec 2012, 01:14
|
|
Replies: 11
Views: 6603
|
| If you want to build on a platform over time, move over to an Ivy Bridge (3000 series) Intel CPU and board. The 3570K is pretty good and any Z77 board would be good. You will get 2x PCI-e 3.0 sockets, and overclockability from the K series chip. Performance on the Intel platform will be a lot better... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: 120/144hz vs 1440p 27" monitors |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 18 Nov 2012, 22:16
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 5583
|
| Does anyone have any recommendations on color setting they use for the P8278Q to make this thing look even better? Every panel is different, so you can do it by eye, give yourself confortable brightness levels in a reasonably lit room, and then make sure white looks white. Beyond that would you nee... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: 120/144hz vs 1440p 27" monitors |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 11 Nov 2012, 12:49
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 5583
|
| You can get a 120Hz 1440P screen, the 2B Catleaps can run at that res. Using later nV cards, I have seen them run up to 132Hz. Realistically your choices at 27" are Dell U2713HM, PB278Q Asus, S27A850T Samsung, ZR2740 HP and the catleaps. There is a viewsonic one also, I forget the name. The HP,... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: Beast system but still not over 30 FPS in eyefinity? |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 15:37
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 3511
|
| Make sure anti-aliasing is turned off, and I seem to remember BF3 being a FPS hog with Ambient Occlusion, try setting that to off, and see if things improve. Also, using Ultra in BF3 puts 4xMSAA on in game, so running at High will increase FPS a lot. |
|
|
Forum: AMD Eyefinity Discussions Topic: Eyefinity work ok on desktop but fails in games |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 16:52
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 3370
|
| What do you have for PSU on that system? And what is the motherboard and CPU? |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: Replacing 7950 with 680? |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 16:49
|
|
Replies: 1
Views: 1386
|
Money isn’t really an issue
Get the 680.
But for my money the 670 is the better buy, you can put the saved money towards 770, 870, whatever it is in the future, or SSD, or whatever :) |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: System Upgrade for 2 x 7970 |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 03 Sep 2012, 18:33
|
|
Replies: 1
Views: 1454
|
| Get the 3570 Intel system. Hyperthreading rarely does anything for gaming, so put the saved money towards a sound card or something similar. Or a good cooler, something like a H80 Corsair would be good. You could also get a 2500K, they generally overclock about the same, and they can be cooled easie... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: CPU OCing and performance gain at triple wide res |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 18 Aug 2012, 18:54
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 7565
|
| [quote]I for one am not going to post anymore here now, you made it perfectly clear you are not going to run these benchmarks that would show the lack/ the increase in performance, I personally do not have the hardware to run them, so I guess we will never know. In a couple of weeks I have some fre... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: CPU OCing and performance gain at triple wide res |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 18 Aug 2012, 07:56
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 7565
|
| So what you are saying is that since PCI-E 1.0 won't slow down a PCI-E 3.0 card, running it in a PCI-E 2.0 system won't slow it down either. He tested using: PCI-e 1.1 16x (2.5GT/ lane (250MB)) = ~4GB/ sec Crysis FPS: 59.15 PCI-e 3.0 1x (8GT/ lane (800MB)) = ~0.8GB/ sec 55.98 PCI-e 3.0 16x (8GT/ la... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: GFX Update (Any Suggestions) |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 18 Aug 2012, 07:30
|
|
Replies: 5
Views: 3115
|
Might be best with a pair of GTX670s? And then maybe incorporate a new motherboard and CPU and RAM into the upgrade? The Phenom II was never really that fast.
2 important questions will be:
1) What is the most intensive game you want to play?
2) How much do you want to spend? |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: CPU OCing and performance gain at triple wide res |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 15 Aug 2012, 09:14
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 7565
|
| Yes, because they say it is the difference between sandy and ivy bridge, the ONLY way to test if PCI-e 2.0 is really holding the card back is to use a PCI-e 2.0 interface and make it spit out more bandwidth. HardOCP used 2 different motherboards with 2 different types of CPU. They could of just used... |
|
|
Forum: Hardware Discussions Topic: CPU OCing and performance gain at triple wide res |
| Gilly |
|
Posted: 13 Aug 2012, 11:10
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 7565
|
His card is a PCI-e 3.0 card being driven from a 2500K on a Z68 board, which are both PCI-e 2.0
I was personally interested if you fed the 7950 more bandwidth from the PCI-e slot if you would get more bang for buck than just overclocking the CPU, but seems you don't wanna do that! |
|
|
| Sort by: |
Login
FAQ
Search
Members