Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 17 Jun 2024, 16:59

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2008, 05:07 
Offline
Founder
Founder
User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 05:00
Posts: 7358
I didn't have the money to buy them.


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 07 Aug 2008, 04:14 
Offline

Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 21:11
Posts: 10
Holy cats--woot!

Thanks very much, Matrox.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2008, 06:09 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2007, 05:24
Posts: 1512
Location: NZ
Her is the official news release
http://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/press/releases/2008/gxm/th2go_widescreen/

Sooo what is the best 22 inch out there? Especially reference bezel size?
Is there any larger than 22' but still using 1680x1050?

Maybe I should buy a couple of the cheaper Dell 24" run them at that res and bump up the AA/AF! :)

_________________
Dipping bags at Mach1.9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2008, 07:00 
Offline

Joined: 15 Sep 2007, 21:28
Posts: 446
Dude get 200-22in you do not want to pump 1680*1050 into a 1920*1200 monitor, you will get poorer quality than on a 20-22


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2008, 07:34 
Offline

Joined: 24 Jun 2006, 09:01
Posts: 96
Now, this barrier of 3 x 1280 x 1024 is broken, I wonder when will the 3 x 1680 x 1050 be broken again?
What is keeping Matrox from going up to 3 x 1920 x 1080/1200 ? Maybe, they are waiting for ATI HD6870 or Nvidia GTX480 to have enough graphic power for those pixels?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2008, 08:49 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2007, 05:24
Posts: 1512
Location: NZ
Dude get 200-22in you do not want to pump 1680*1050 into a 1920*1200 monitor, you will get poorer quality than on a 20-22
I dunno just for a test I ran CoD4 on my 24" Dell at 1680x1050 with 16AA/AF it looked fine!

_________________
Dipping bags at Mach1.9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2008, 09:14 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2004, 17:42
Posts: 3436
[quote]Dude get 200-22in you do not want to pump 1680*1050 into a 1920*1200 monitor, you will get poorer quality than on a 20-22
I dunno just for a test I ran CoD4 on my 24" Dell at 1680x1050 with 16AA/AF it looked fine!And mine looks fine too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2008, 12:35 
Offline

Joined: 06 Jul 2008, 23:41
Posts: 5
[quote]Dude get 200-22in you do not want to pump 1680*1050 into a 1920*1200 monitor, you will get poorer quality than on a 20-22
I dunno just for a test I ran CoD4 on my 24" Dell at 1680x1050 with 16AA/AF it looked fine!

That may be true but 16AA/AF at 5040x1050 will be hard to run.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2008, 13:16 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2004, 17:42
Posts: 3436
Believe it or not mine looks fine with just 2xAA and on the desktop/windows etc. (if you didn't know) you wouldn't be able to tell it wasn't the native res.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2008, 19:16 
Offline

Joined: 15 Sep 2007, 21:28
Posts: 446
Okay, I guess I could be wrong, I just hear the monitor scalers were evil.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group