Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 27 Dec 2024, 11:25

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 20 Jun 2007, 22:21 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2004, 17:42
Posts: 3436
Find the ... etqwconfig.cfg ... in (Vista) ... C:UsersUser NameDocumentsEnemy Territory Quake Wars Public Betabase ... open it with WordPad

Change these lines ... to ...

seta r_customAspectRatioV "1"

seta r_customAspectRatioH "4"

seta r_aspectRatio "-1"

seta r_customHeight "1024"

seta r_customWidth "3840"

seta r_mode "-1"

























Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 20 Jun 2007, 22:51 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2006, 16:57
Posts: 1317
Wow, great that it's all good n proper....

But what awful, AWFUL graphics. Megatexture my arse.

_________________
Formerly eZ`

Follow me on twitter: @theg00seberry and find me on Steam


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2007, 03:33 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 29 May 2006, 02:23
Posts: 873
demos never come with high end textures.

Reason #1 is download size...and reason #2, why put all the whistles on a non-finished product?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2007, 05:22 
Offline

Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 18:04
Posts: 259
Wow, great that it's all good n proper....

But what awful, AWFUL graphics. Megatexture my arse.


Its just the beta.. I'm sure it will be improved.

It seems the game isn't designed for triplehead. Notice how the tree's and mountains aren't rendered properly at the sides. Your not supposed to see them like that I'm sure... They go like that when not in view on a normal setup with one monitor but with triplehead you see it.
Although the tree's dont really look great anyway....

:WWTH2Go


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2007, 08:40 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2004, 17:42
Posts: 3436
Sorry guys ... I think that is as good as it gets ... those screenshots were with everything at MAX ...
Here is one with everything at MIN ...




It seems the game isn't designed for triplehead. Notice how the tree's and mountains aren't rendered properly at the sides. Your not supposed to see them like that I'm sure... They go like that when not in view on a normal setup with one monitor but with triplehead you see it.
Although the tree's dont really look great anyway....
Actually I think it all looks good in TH ... and the sidescreen distortion is normal for TH ...
http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/node/7185

Also ... in game it doesn't seem half as bad as it is in the screenshots ... that goes for textures etc. on MAX and the distortion ... I also think the trees aren't so bad either ... :? ... :lol: ... are my standards dropping ... ? ... :lol:

The mega textures do help the distant land look fine ... no tiling ... it kinda tricks the eye and looks very good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2007, 10:30 
Offline

Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 18:04
Posts: 259
Its not the distortion, I know thats normal and doesn't bother me at all. Its how the tree's look like flat 2d sprites on the sides in some of the screenshots.

I do think the graphics over all are pretty good though, and the full game will most likely be awesome!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2007, 10:52 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2004, 17:42
Posts: 3436
Oh yeah it is odd how the trees on the sidescreens look like that ...
I think it is just the way the trees go as they go further into the distance ... and the sidescreens tend to kinda magnify things sometimes.

Being on the sidescreens it isn't too much of a problem as those sidescreens are just for adding to the immersion your too busy concentrating on the center screen ... I hadn't really noticed them until you pointed it out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2007, 13:27 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2006, 16:57
Posts: 1317
demos never come with high end textures.

Reason #1 is download size...and reason #2, why put all the whistles on a non-finished product?


I'd put money on the released product looking IDENTICAL. They won't be making graphical changes at this stage.

Textures may look good in the distance, but when they look useless close up, what's the point? I guess i should reserve judgement till i actually play it though, jumping to conclusions based on screenshots atm.

How about a high-res fraps Paddy? :)

_________________
Formerly eZ`

Follow me on twitter: @theg00seberry and find me on Steam


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2007, 14:18 
Offline

Joined: 08 Oct 2005, 19:26
Posts: 93
Not very pretty is it. Think BF looks better than this


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2007, 22:38 
Offline

Joined: 29 Nov 2006, 20:48
Posts: 1
Not very pretty is it. Think BF looks better than this


Nope. I know it's subjective with how things "look" but having played both engines now I give the ET:QW the nod over the ageing BF2 engine.

And thanks Paddy for the TH settings! I downloaded the client last night and tried the game on the beta servers. It seems to play pretty well for a beta. No doubt they'll be problems, but then that's what testing is for.

With this being one of the first few DX10 enabled online battle games, hopefully it holds me until Crysis and UT3 come out.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group