Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 26 Dec 2024, 21:16

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2008, 17:03 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52
Posts: 5706
I'll sort out my act and test out Vista to NAS speeds (and NAS to Vista speeds) ASAP. Will be interested to see if it's different to XP/NAS speeds...


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 25 Apr 2008, 17:14 
Offline

Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 16:13
Posts: 76
That would indeed be interesting to see. (and back on topic too)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Apr 2008, 01:08 
Offline

Joined: 28 May 2007, 03:10
Posts: 845
My results for any combination where one side was xp or linux(nas) were the same, even if the other was vista. Only vista to vista functionned properly. Overall I get 10mbytes/s one way and 20mbytes/s the other way, give or take a few megs.

As for sata speeds, theoretically the interfaces are 1.5gbits/s and 3gbits/s for sata v1 or v2. Unfortunately the source platters rarely feed them with more then about 450-480mbits/s, hence the typical 50-60mbytes/s performance from a single drive.

In theory if you had 2-3 drives in raid 0, you should be able to saturate the gigabit interface with more then it can pass.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 May 2008, 04:07 
Offline

Joined: 22 Aug 2007, 21:22
Posts: 14
Goddang it I knows this one, try this and see if transfer rates improve at all.

run a cmd shell

ipv6 uninstall

reboot

done


Give it a shot, what have you got to lose? ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 May 2008, 04:18 
Offline

Joined: 28 May 2007, 03:10
Posts: 845
I've unchecked use of ipv6 from the first install day, doesn't that prevent it interfering?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 May 2008, 06:22 
Offline

Joined: 22 Aug 2007, 21:22
Posts: 14
follow my instructions and see if they work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 May 2008, 14:28 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52
Posts: 5706
I'll give it a shot.

I forgot about this due to work being... well, shit.

Vista is no faster to/from the NAS than XP.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 May 2008, 21:00 
Offline

Joined: 28 May 2007, 03:10
Posts: 845
I've found that all combos of OSs have problems except vista2vista.

examples:
vista pc to/from nas/linux
xp pc to/from nas/linux
vista pc to/from xp pc

all these share low performance

vista pc to/from vista laptop
this one is the only working full speed (55-65mbytes/s both ways)

my only guess is the changed/reworked networking engine that only works properly if it doesn't have to deal with an old version in xp/linux.

Although I haven't tried it yet, synology support has told me about http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf/#download so I could test my nas without the hdd as a variable. I'm gonna see later if that has a different result.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group