imusrt wrote:
Shit sorry I misread your post. I missed the whole "triple" part. I will answer proper later if no-one else does.
EDIT:
Card Recommendations:
You have 2560x1080x3 = 8,294,400 total gaming px.
= 2 high-end graphics cards will run it decent (somewhat short life). E.g. R9 390 or 390X.
= 3 high-end cards will run it well. E.g. R9 390 or 390X.
= 2 extreme cards run it very well, bit overkill. E.g. R9 Nano, R9 Fury or FuryX.
= 1 SUPER-extreme card runs it very well, bit overkill. E.g. Radeon Pro Duo (releasing 2016 Q2, it is equal to two "extreme" graphics cards)
This all is rough but close.
Unrequested advice (ignore bias as needed):
I find it a bit disturbing that people are combining ultrawides for MM. Think what your games will look like.
If you have not yet purchased your monitors, consider your aspect's width VS your height. Is triple Ultrawide truly what you want? Don't let me dissuade you, but think about it. Your chosen aspect will cause many games to look not great, due to side-stretch FOV anomaly (extreme fish-eye). Your vertical vision also will not be covered, while your setup's width is actually wider than your vision (wasting PC resources). If your monitors can cover your vision (like glasses), it is the most immersive MM experience. All that said, some people are doing triple Ultrawide, to each his own. I am not into personally it.
Why no NVIDIA cards?
Login
FAQ
Search
Members
