[quote]Of course sadly PC gamers are too whiney to accept such a thing.
Bold words I say
Let's talk about my case, shall I have enough gaming budget to get myself 5 60$ games each month I wouldn't complain about it...
However, as it is, I'm already waiting for games to drop price before buying ...
Still, it wouldn't change my life a lot since I would just delay more to give it more time to drop price ...
(there's actually other reasons for my waiting, among them the patching process and hardware catch up or even mod development...)
Well it all relates. How many times have we seen people on this forum like cranky or paradigm say they are waiting to buy something until it's cheap because they have a ton of other games to play? How many times have we seen PC gamers say things like "well I still play Battlefield 2, I don't need Bad Company" or the like?
We are a more mature group with more patience, and thus we spend less money on software. We are competing with a massive mainstream group of gamers of whom a large portion are 15-25 year olds who need EVERY new hit game NOW.
It all ties in to this being a business, and companies go where the money is. There is no loyalty, no sense of honor to the past, a game will come out on PC if the publisher thinks there is money to be made on the platform. Piracy, less mainstream crowd, more mature crowd, larger backlog of games, lower prices expected, higher demands for port quality... ALL this stuff hurts the bottom line on PC, rightly or wrongly.
So the way to see more focus on PC is to find ways to enhance the bottom line despite all that. MMOs do by having a subscription fee, multiplayer games do by cutting down on piracy and resale, etc. etc.. A way for singleplayer games to do so, especially large and long ones like Assassin's Creed 2 or Fallout New Vegas, is to charge more for the game. No one can argue those games are not worth $60 in my opinion... heck, millions proved they were on consoles with inferior versions.