it's not, I'm not changing how the universe works
It is a precondition for accepting that the impossible is now possible. You can't just say "what if there was a huge privacy network that worked?" and expect to form useful conclusions without defining the preconditions that would make this possible. I could simply say "what if there was a DRM that was completely uncrackable?" Then your entire notion of this privacy network is moot.
sure, however unless the TOR node owner is actually using his computer for illegal stuff,
We're talking about the possibility of pirates using them to hide their tracks, remember? It's a given that the TOR node is being used for illegal stuff.
but two things : 1)you suppose they would make no effort whatsoever to discourage its use...
I honestly can't picture them creating a TOS that forbids it and actively enforcing it. Of course if they did, that would reduce piracy anyway.
2)then every and each internet relay is guilty of those charges (relaying illegal data) so this would challenge the whole principle of how internet works by making relays responsible of what data pass through their computers ...
Not every relay hides the identity of the receiving computer, though. And anonymity was never a basic principal of how the Internet works.
you don't need a lot of individuals to make an effective P2P network ... (Direct Connect)
Yes... that's exactly why BT is the de facto P2P of choice for pirating whatever the latest game is, and not DC.
a computer router or a hardware router doesn't make any difference, it's still a link ...
It's a link that your diagram does not include.
but fine since you will obviously not agree on this let's forget about this one and instead see this :
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/ ... jxta2.html
There is nothing you have quoted from that article that contradicts any of my points. Mostly it just verifies what I've been saying.